home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT2717>
- <title>
- Oct. 16, 1989: On The Prowl With Vulgar Chic
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- Oct. 16, 1989 The Ivory Trail
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- FASHION, Page 92
- On the Prowl with Vulgar Chic
- </hdr><body>
- <p>In the salons and on the streets, herds of animal prints abound
- </p>
- <p> It's a jungle out there. On the Via Veneto, across 57th
- Street or up Michigan Avenue, animals that look strangely like
- women are prancing in herds, and spots swim before the eyes. The
- designs the women are wearing are not the real thing, of course,
- but thick faux furs and diaphanous fabric in sexy, primitive
- patterns. And the customers cannot seem to get enough of them:
- they're snapping up zebra-stripe blazers, panther-print pumps,
- fake tiger coats, imitation ocelot boleros and giraffe pants.
- Says a spokesman for Paris' Dorothee Bis: "It's the theme of the
- year."
- </p>
- <p> It's more like a craze, and one that comes as somewhat of
- a surprise out on the street. Although couturiers like Yves
- Saint Laurent have used animal prints for years in subtle and
- expensive ways, jungle patterns, with their hint of sensual
- mystery and animal sexuality, have mostly been associated with
- the showier side of show biz; the imitable Zsa Zsa, for example,
- recently turned up in a Beverly Hills courtroom wearing a vast
- spotted-print number. To be sure, it has always been O.K. for
- mainstream dreamers to be tigresses in private: catty underwear
- remains a steady seller. Now, after a drab decade of swathing
- for success in somber tones, slender stripes and severe lines,
- it seems that women are once again letting part of it, at least,
- hang out in pseudo-animal skins that have a kind of tacky charm
- -- or, as Bruce Binder, Macy's Northeast Fashion Director, puts
- it, "vulgar chic."
- </p>
- <p> The look has clawed its way to the top for reasons topical
- and technological. For one thing, a decade ago fake-fur coats
- were lumpy modacrylic numbers that clever designers dismissed
- as "mama coats," garments that conservative women bought to keep
- out the cold. Now refined techniques allow realistic animal
- patterns to be printed on more vibrant and active fabrics, such
- as Lycra, stretch velour and even sheer silk mousseline.
- </p>
- <p> For another thing, the animal-rights movement, having
- attacked the fashion industry for its use of real animal skins,
- has, in part, boosted the new fad by encouraging designers to
- play with the unreal thing in their lines. Designer Christian
- Lacroix's fringed panther-print polymid shawl ($470) is hot
- stuff. Patrick Kelly has scored with skinny dresses in leopard
- stretch velvet ($340), and even purist Giorgio Armani uses mock
- lynx for a duffle coat in the Emporio Armani line ($685). After
- dark, the more the merrier seems to be the rule. Says Annie
- Allanche, a manager at Paris' Irie boutique: "Women are mixing
- leopard, tiger, giraffe and ocelot for evening."
- </p>
- <p> Accessories in spots and stripes are big items as well.
- Marshall Field's in Chicago has a ponytail garter ($8) and a
- leopard-spotted headband ($10). At New York City's Saks Fifth
- Avenue a cheetah chiffon bow ($25 to $45) and a jaguar belt
- ($165) are moving well. Kids can get jungle-cat skirts ($30) and
- flannel dresses ($55) at Henri Bendel in Manhattan.
- </p>
- <p> Still, some clothiers are pussyfooting around the trend. In
- what may be a new high (or low) in fashion irony, Milan's
- Gianfranco Ferre is selling a real rabbit fur jacket for about
- $2,700. But it has been printed to look like leopard. It's hard
- for some of these cats to change their spots.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-